MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electrocorticography

2000· article· en· W4299520449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEpileptic Disorders · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrocorticographyResectionEpilepsyEpilepsy surgeryMedicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrocorticography (ECOG), the intra-operative recording of cortical potentials, has played an important role in the surgical management of patients with medically refractory epilepsy. It has been used 1) to localize the epileptogenic tissue; 2) map out cortical functions; and 3) predict the success of the surgery. Despite its common use, few studies have been done to prove its effectiveness in these areas. The technique used in children for recording ECOG is very similar to that used in adults except for the limitations imposed by the child's age. Anaesthesia must often be used. Based upon a computerized medical literature search, a review of this procedure was done. Pre-resection localization, and post-resection prediction of outcome was done for temporal and extra-temporal resection, both lesional and nonlesional. Most of the available studies were in adult patients. All were retrospective in nature. Evidence for the role of pre-resection ECOG in determining the degree of resection felt necessary to obtain good clinical outcome was limited. Similarly the post-resection ECOG predication of surgical outcome was restricted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it