MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299533488 · doi:10.1159/000480579

Captopril Pharmacokinetics, Blood Pressure Response andPlasma Renin Activity in Normotensive Children with RenalScarring

2019· article· en· W4299533488 on OpenAlexaff
Maurice Lévy, Gideon Koren, Julia Klein, Gordon A. McLorie, J. Williamson Balfe

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaptoprilPlasma renin activityPharmacokineticsBlood pressureInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineKidneyRenin–angiotensin systemPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We studied blood pressure response, plasma renin activity (PRA) and captopril pharmacokinetics in 8 children receiving orally 0.7 mg/kg of the drug. The drug increased PRA in all patients, in 5 to abnormally high levels. Peak captopril concentrations were achieved between half an hour and 2 h, and ranged between 100 and 547 ng/ml. Mean elimination half-time (T(1/2)) was 1.5 h, ranging between 0.98 and 2.3 h. There was a significant positive correlation between the area under the curve (AUC) and elimination T(1/2) of the drug. There was a significant inverse correlation between AUC or elimination T(1/2) and percent change in diastolic blood pressure; the 2 children who had no change in diastolic blood pressure had the largest AUC and the lowest apparent clearance of captopril. The kidney is the major site of captopril’s pharmacological action. It is possible that longer retention of captopril in the plasma, evidenced by larger AUC, may reflect less captopril available to modulate renin activity in the kidney.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.858

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental Pharmacology and TherapeuticsSame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207