MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299537821 · doi:10.1002/9780470050118.ecse920

Computational Intelligence

2008· other· en· W4299537821 on OpenAlexaff
James F. Peters, Witold Pedrycz

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering · 2008
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational intelligenceRough setGenetic programmingComputer scienceArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceContext (archaeology)Soft computingFuzzy logicIntelligent decision support systemSet (abstract data type)Fuzzy setGenetic algorithmNeuro-fuzzyMachine learningFuzzy control system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Several interpretations of the notion of computational intelligence (CI) exist. Computationally intelligent systems have been characterized by Bezdek relative to adaptivity, fault‐tolerance, speed, and error rates. In its original conception, many technologies belonged to computational intelligence, namely, neural networks, genetic algorithms, fuzzy systems, evolutionary programming, and artificial life. More recently, rough set theory and its extensions to approximate reasoning and real‐time decision systems have been considered in the context of computationally intelligent systems. Overall, CI can be regarded as a synergy of genetic, fuzzy, rough, and neural computing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and EngineeringSame topicRough Sets and Fuzzy LogicFrench-language works237,207