MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299608326 · doi:10.1109/tec.2022.3196850

Induction Machine Emulation For Open Circuit and Short Circuit Grid Faults

2022· article· en· W4299608326 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationRobustness (evolution)Fault (geology)Computer scienceEngineeringStuck-at faultGridFault detection and isolationElectronic engineeringControl engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of the present research work is to develop a robust induction machine emulator. The emulator can be used to test different types of open circuit and short circuit grid faults along with starting and loading transients. Power hardware in loop (PHIL) technology is used for the machine emulation. It requires a highly accurate and adaptable model for the chosen test cases and opted emulator configuration. For open circuit fault test case, the induction machine mathematical model is developed systematically to emulate the machine backemf at the open circuit terminals. The proposed model adapts to the chosen emulator configuration by incorporating the emulator parameters in it. Finally, the novel induction machine emulator proves its robustness and performance not only for open circuit faults but also for short circuit, starting and loading fault transients. Open circuit auto reclosing analysis and considerations in developing reclosing algorithms are detailed. Identification of different fault signatures, which aid fault diagnosis are also briefly presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it