Bibliographic record
Abstract
Qu'est-ce que l'imaginaire du Nord ? Principes thiquesRsum -Le Nord est un espace imagin et reprsent depuis des sicles par les artistes et les crivains du monde occidental, ce qui a men, au fil du temps et de l'accumulation successive de couches de discours, la cration d'un imaginaire du Nord -que ce Nord soit celui de la Scandinavie, du Groenland, de la Russie ou du Grand Nord, ou encore des ples.Or les Occidentaux ont atteint le Ple Nord il n'y a qu'un sicle, ce qui fait du Nord le produit d'un double regard, de l'extrieur -les reprsentations, surtout occidentales -et de l'intrieur -les cultures nordiques (inuites, scandinaves, cries, etc.).Les premires tant souvent simplifies et les secondes mconnues, si l'on souhaite tudier le Nord dans une perspective d'ensemble, nous devons donc poser deux questions : comment dfinir le Nord par l'imaginaire ?Selon quels principes thiques devons-nous considrer les cultures nordiques pour en avoir une vue complte, incluant notamment celles qui ont t minores par le Sud ?Nous rpondrons ici ces deux questions, d'abord en dfinissant l'imaginaire du Nord, puis en proposant un programme intgrateur pour recomplexifier l'Arctique culturel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".