MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299855045 · doi:10.61091/um120-08

The Irredundance-related Ramsey Numbers \(s(3,8)=21\) and \(w(3,8)=21\)

2024· article· en· W4299855045 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUtilitas Mathematica · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a graph G and for non-negative integers p, q, and r, the triplet \((p, q, r)\) is said to be an admissible triplet if \(3p + 4q + 6r = |E(G)|\). If G admits a decomposition into p cycles of length 3, q cycles of length 4, and r cycles of length 6 for every admissible triplet \((p, q, r)\), then we say that G has a \(\{C_{3}^{p}, C_{4}^{q}, C_{6}^{r}\}\)-decomposition. In this paper, the necessary conditions for the existence of \(\{C_{3}^{p}, C_{4}^{q}, C_{6}^{r}\}\)-decomposition of \(K_{\ell, m, n} (\ell \leq m \leq n)\) are proved to be sufficient. This affirmatively answers the problem raised in Decomposing complete tripartite graphs into cycles of lengths 3 and 4, Discrete Math. 197/198 (1999), 123-135. As a corollary, we deduce the main results of Decomposing complete tripartite graphs into cycles of lengths 3 and 4, Discrete Math., 197/198, 123-135 (1999) and Decompositions of complete tripartite graphs into cycles of lengths 3 and 6, Austral. J. Combin., 73(1), 220-241 (2019).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it