Early Campanian silicoflagellates from the Ural Federal District, Russia: a taxonomic and biostratigraphic reexamination of the A. P. Jousé sample suite
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nine samples of broad Late Cretaceous age, previously studied by the respected Russian diatomistA.P. Jousé, were reexamined in order to document the taxonomic composition of silicoflagellates at several localities within the Ural Federal District of Russia. New observations are provided on the range of morphological variability in several important taxa, and a new morphological term, “segment”, is presented for the basal skeletal components of Cornua. An attempt is also made to refine the age determinations for these samples using a recently established silicoflagellate biostratigraphic zonation for theCanadianmargin.Our general conclusion is that the zonation developed based on the Canadian sections can be successfully used to provide age control for sections exposed in the northern part of Eurasia. The samples studied here are probably correlative to the lower Campanian Cornua trifurcata Partial Range Zone and the lowermost Campanian Schulzyocha ruppelii Range Zone of northern Canada. However, the recognition of the Schulzyocha ruppelii Zone is based on the presence of a secondary zonalmarker (Gleserocha tapiae), due to the absence of Schulzyocha. Thismay indicate that only the Cornua trifurcata Zone has interregional applicability, while the Schulzyocha ruppelii Zone may be restricted to the Canadian successions due to the endemism of Schulzyocha. Further studies on Late Cretaceous silicoflagellate paleobiogeography are required to resolve these issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it