[Not Available].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Studies targeting children born with HIV have principally focused on the period preceding the announcement of the diagnosis to the child. The objective of the present study was to explore intrafamilial communication dynamics following the announcement of the diagnosis. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-nine youths (10 to 18 years of age) living with HIV since birth participated in individual semistructured interviews about the following: 1) serostatus disclosure, 2) family relations and 3) sexual education within the family. The testimonials underwent a content analysis. RESULTS: The youths learned of their HIV-positive diagnosis at the average age of 11 years. The dynamic established after the announcement appears to be regulated by silence: the exchanges that follow mainly involve questions related to medication and prevention of sexual transmission of the virus. This silence preserves the familial equilibrium by performing three functions: protecting the mother from a feeling of guilt regarding transmission, assuring family harmony and feeling normal compared with others. The adolescent's diagnosis is generally not revealed to the extended family, thus preserving their integration within the family by protecting them from rejection, betrayal and judgement. DISCUSSION: The functions of silence and the secret serve as important stabilizers within the family. However, they contribute to the isolation of the adolescents in the form of emotional support that they still need. Suggestions for intervention are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.756 | 0.467 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".