Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2012), "Advances in Health Care Management", Friedman, L.H., Savage, G.T. and Goes, J. (Ed.) Annual Review of Health Care Management: Strategy and Policy Perspectives on Reforming Health Systems (Advances in Health Care Management, Vol. 13), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. iii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-8231(2012)0000013017 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Annual Review of Health Care Management: Strategy and Policy Perspectives on Reforming Health Systems Advances in Health Care Management Advances in Health Care Management Copyright Page List of Contributors List of Reviewers Editorial Advisory Board Preface Current Medical Staff Governance and Physician Sensemaking: A Formula for Resistance to High Reliability Physician Practice Responses to Financial Incentive Programs: Exploring the Concept of Implementation Mechanisms Crew Resource Management and Teamwork Training in Health Care: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for how to Leverage such Interventions to Enhance Patient Safety The Effect of Professional Identity on Comprehensiveness in Strategic Decision Making: Physician Executives in the Canadian Health Care Context Information Sharing Among Health Care Employers: Using Technology to Create an Advantageous Culture of Sharing Framing and Measuring International Patient Management Efficiency as a Domain of Health Care Systems: A Phenomenographic Approach The Changing Configuration of Hospital Systems: Centralization, Federalization, or Fragmentation? Concluding Remarks
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".