MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299993258 · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2004p0210

Characterization of Vacuum Plasma Sprayed Boron Carbide

2004· article· en· W4299993258 on OpenAlexaff
Hamidreza Salimijazi, Thomas W. Coyle, J. Mostaghimi, L. Leblanc

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal spray · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsPyrogenesis (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceBoron carbideX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyRaman spectroscopyMicrostructureBoronAmorphous solidEquiaxed crystalsBoron oxideCarbideGrain boundaryMetallurgyMicrocrystallineIndentation hardnessAmorphous carbonAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringOxideCrystallographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Boron carbide has been successfully deposited on Ti alloy by vacuum plasma spraying (VPS). Mechanical properties of the deposited structure were assessed by micro-hardness and nano-hardness indentation. Chemical and phase compositions of the starting powder and the as-sprayed structure were characterized using hot gas extraction (LECO), x-ray diffraction (XRD), x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and Raman spectroscopy. The microstructure consisted of equiaxed boron carbide grains, microcrystalline boron carbide particles, and amorphous carbon regions at the grain boundaries. The amount of boron oxide and amorphous carbon increased during spraying. Carbon segregation to grain boundaries in the as-deposited B4C was observed. The measured micro-hardness was slightly higher than values previously reported (1033 ± 2009 HV). There was significant variation of nano-hardness from point to point in the material due to the existence of multiple phases, splat boundaries, and porosity in the deposited structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal spraySame topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207