MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300002699 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2022.0144

Love Enamored and Driven Mad by Lucrezia Marinella

2022· article· en· W4300002699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amy Sinclair

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomanceArtPoetryArcadiaMythologyEarly modern EuropeLiteratureArt historyRomanticismClassicsHistoryHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Love Enamored and Driven Mad by Lucrezia Marinella Amy Sinclair Love Enamored and Driven Mad. By Lucrezia Marinella. Ed. and trans. by Janet E. Gomez and Maria Galli Stampino. (The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe: The Toronto Series, 72, Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 567) Toronto: Iter Press; Tempe, AZ: ACMRS Press. 2020. xviii+ 209 pp. $41.95. ISBN 978–0–86698–625–0. Janet E. Gomez and Maria Galli Stampino’s translation presents, for the first time in English, one of Lucrezia Marinella’s less familiar yet no less significant works: Amore innamorato et impazzato (1618). Its publication in 2020 alongside translations of Valeria Miani’s Amorous Hope and Arcangela Tarabotti’s Convent Paradise and Antisatire—all part of The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe series—has spotlighted the dynamism and diversity of women’s writing in seventeenth-century Venice. Marinella’s importance within this milieu and early modern literary history more broadly is brought to the fore with this English translation of Amore innamorato. An allegorical poem written in ottava rima, the work is a novel revisioning of the classical myth of Cupid and Psyche. By the time of its publication in 1618, Marinella had already published a number of hagiographic works, her ground-breaking feminist treatise La nobiltà et l’eccellenza delle donne, co’ diffetti et mancamenti de gli huomini (1601), and the pastoral romance Arcadia felice (1605). In keeping with her eclectic œuvre, Amore innamorato is underpinned by Marinella’s erudition in classical and contemporary literature and marked by innovations in the representation of gender. As Gomez and Stampino argue in their Introduction, Marinella’s rewriting of the story of Cupid and Psyche ‘turns this plot—and its gendered character traits—upside down’ (p. 1). The introduction to the translation includes an overview of Marinella’s biography and diverse corpus, and an accessible summary of key sources (including Dante’s Divine Comedy and Ovid’s Metamorphoses) and their influences on Amore innamorato. Particularly helpful is the detailed description of the work’s relationship with the principal source text (the Cupid and Psyche myth in Apuleius’s Metamorphoses; or, The Golden Ass). The editors highlight Marinella’s maternal and devoted Venus, and violent and narcissistic Cupid, as key subversions of Apuleius’s overly emotional, belligerent, and self-centred Venus and more favourable depiction of Cupid. Gomez and Stampino also note the significance of Marinella’s allegory in which male characters represent concupiscence (Cupid) and irascibility (Iridio) while the female character Ersilia represents rationality: ‘Marinella bestows the most prestigious allegorical role on the only female human character’ (p. 20). The editors also point to exciting opportunities for further research with their identification of the notable breadth of knowledge of the natural world exhibited in Amore innamorato—about comets and astronomy, flowers, trees, animals, and geography (pp. 44–45). Such analysis would extend our understanding of Marinella’s significance, as argued by Meredith Ray, among women at the vanguard of early modern scientific culture (Ray, Daughters of Alchemy: Women and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015)). Similarly, [End Page 722] the editors’ suggestion of Amore innamorato’s possible influence on Giovan Battista Marino’s L’Adone (1623) deserves further investigation, as does the broader reception and influence of Marinella’s text within Seicento academic and literary circles. Gomez and Stampino’s translation is a pleasure to read. The ten cantos are neatly formatted to parallel the original, with clear distinctions between the argument and allegory which introduce each canto and the poem itself. The editors’ notes elucidate the text’s extensive references, particularly to classical mythology. Amore innamorato is arguably one of Marinella’s most engaging works, and this translation will be of interest to scholars (including non-specialists) and students alike. Its central themes of emotion, ego, the pursuit of power, and unrequited love are enriched by Marinella’s revisionist approach to classical and early modern paradigms of gender. With Venus and Ersilia steadfast in their virtuousness, it is Cupid’s subjection to fiery emotions and narcissism that drives the destruction in the narrative. Cupid crafting his malicious arrow in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207