MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300061831 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10512102.1

Building bridges over troubled waters

2022· preprint· en· W4300061831 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kerri Finlay, Brian McQuinn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWater securityInfluencer marketingIntervention (counseling)Natural (archaeology)Climate changeKey (lock)Adaptation (eye)Environmental planningPolitical scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceBusinessComputer scienceGeographyEcologyComputer securityPsychologyWater resources

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water security is a global threat that is intensifying with increasing demands for freshwater and climate change. Scientific advances provide tools to address issues of water quantity and quality, but new advances in conflict resolution (CR) theory are also required. Here, we discuss new CR theory (conflict analysis as the intervention, and the use of middle-influencers as key players), along with a case-study of the application of these CR advances in a water-stressed region of Canada. We argue that continued adaptation, iteration, and refinement of CR theory involving both social and natural scientists is crucial for addressing water-related conflicts globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0020.016
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransboundary Water Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207