MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300095282 · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2004p0958

Effect of Measurement Technique on Particle Temperature and Velocity Values in a Plasma Spray Jet

2004· article· en· W4300095282 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. Hussary, D. Outcalt, J. Craig, R. Parker, J. Heberlein

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal spray · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJet (fluid)Thermal sprayingMaterials sciencePlasmaParticle (ecology)Particle velocityTemperature measurementPlasma torchAnalytical Chemistry (journal)TorchSpray characteristicsMechanicsSpray nozzleThermodynamicsComposite materialPhysicsChemistryNuclear physicsChromatographyNozzle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The distributions of spray particle velocity and temperature were determined with two different instruments, the SpectraViz (Stratonics, Laguna Hills, CA) and the DPV2000 (Tecnar Automation, Montreal, Canada). Experiments were performed with three different powders and a Praxair SG 100 plasma spray torch. The instruments differ by the method they use in imaging the jet ultimately allowing for measurements of velocities and temperatures. The average particle temperature values obtained are very close, indicating that different ways of imaging do not influence the measurement value. The values for the average velocities are in good agreement for two of the powders tested (Al2O3 and CrO2), however, for the YSZ powder a consistent difference in velocity values was found. It appears that for obtaining average values e.g. for process control, both instruments are equivalent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal spraySame topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207