MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300411241

Implantación de guías de buenas prácticas en España. Programa de centros comprometidos con la excelencia en cuidados / Best Practice Guidelines Implementation in Spain. Best Practice Spotlight Organizations / Implementação de manuais sobre boas práticas na Espanha. Programa dos Centros comprometidos com a excelência no atendimento

2015· article· es· W4300411241 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
BS. Laura Albornos-Muñoz, Esther González‐María, Teresa Moreno‐Casbas

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBest practiceMedicinePolitical scienceHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducción: El programa de implantación de Guías de Buenas Prácticas, denominado en España Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados®, se inició en 2010 tras un acuerdo de colaboración entre la Unidad de Investigación en Cuidados de Salud (Investén-isciii) de España, el Centro Colaborador Español del Instituto Joanna Briggs para los Cuidados de Salud basados en la Evidencia y la Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), siguiendo los mismos principios que el programa Best Practice Spotlight Organizations (BPSO®) iniciado por RNAO, en Canadá, en 1999. Objetivo: Describir la implantación de Guías de Buenas Prácticas de RNAO en el marco del programa de Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados® (Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®) en España. El programa tiene como objetivo fomentar, facilitar y apoyar la implantación, evaluación y mantenimiento de buenas prácticas en cuidados, para el periodo 2012-2014. Metodología y Resultados: se han seleccionado 8 instituciones de salud y una universidad que implantan las guías de buenas prácticas de RNAO en función de sus necesidades. Tras los 24 primeros meses de implantación se ha formado a los profesionales de salud, constituido grupos estables de trabajo, desarrollado o actualizado protocolos de cuidados y registros correspondientes, también se han evaluado de forma sistemática los resultados de proceso y de salud de los pacientes. También se han difundido activamente los principales logros del programa. Conclusiones: Los candidatos a Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados® están realizando un gran esfuerzo y los resultados empiezan a mostrar que son positivos, con una creciente cultura de cuidados basados en la evidencia, y el impulso de la investigación y el inicio de un trabajo colaborativo en red. [Albornos-Muñoz L, González-María E, Moreno-Casbas T. Implantación de guías de buenas prácticas en España. Programa de centros comprometidos con la excelencia en cuidados. MedUNAB 2015; 17 (3): xx-xx]. Introduction: The Best Practice Guidelines Implementation Programme, called in Spain “Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados®”, started in 2010 thanks to the collaboration between the Nursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii), in Spain, the Spanish Collaborating Centre of the Joanna Briggs Institute for evidence based healthcare, and the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO), Canada. It is based on the same fundaments of Best Practice Spotlight Organizations (BPSO®) Program, initiated by RNAO, in 1999, in Canada. Objective: To describe the implementation of Best Practice Guidelines developed by RNAO in the context of Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados® Program. The program aims to promote, facilitate and support the implementation, evaluation and sustainability of nursing best practices, for the period 2012-2014. Methodology and Results: Eight healthcare institutions and one university were selected to implement RNAO Best Practice Guidelines aligned with their needs. Twenty-four months into the implementation Programme healthcare professionals have been trained, work teams have been established, nursing care protocols and records have been developed or updated, and process and patient results have been systematically evaluated. Also, all main achievements of the Programme have been actively disseminated. Conclusions: Candidates centers committed to excellence in cuidados® are working hard and the results are starting to show positive, with a growing culture of evidence-based care, and the promotion of research and the start of work collaborative networking. [Albornos-Muñoz L, González-María E, Moreno-Casbas T. Best Practice Guidelines Implementation in Spain. Best Practice Spotlight Organizations. MedUNAB 2015; 17 (3): xx-xx]. Introdução: O programa para implementar Manuais de Boas Práticas, chamados na Espanha de Centros Comprometidos com a Excelência no atendimento®, teve início em 2010 depois de um acordo de colaboração entre a Unidade de Investigação em Atendimento de Saúde (Investén-ISCIII), na Espanha, o Centro Colaborador espanhol do Instituto Joanna Briggs de Atenção à Saúde baseada em evidências e a Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), seguindo os mesmos princípios do programa de Best Practice Spotlight Organizations (BPSO®) iniciado por RNAO no Canadá em 1999. Objetivo: Descrever a implementação de manuais de boas práticas no âmbito do programa RNAO de Centros Comprometidos com a Excelência no Atendimento® (Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®) na Espanha. O programa tem como objetivo estimular, facilitar e apoiar a implementação, avaliação e manutenção de boas práticas nos cuidados no período de 2012-2014. Metodologia e Resultados: Foram selecionadas oito instituições de saúde e uma universidade que implementam as diretrizes de boas práticas RNAO de acordo com suas necessidades. Após os primeiros 24 meses de implantação, foram treinados profissionais de saúde, formados grupos estáveis de trabalho, desenvolvidos ou atualizados protocolos de atendimento e registros correspondentes, também foram avaliados sistematicamente os resultados do processo e de saúde dos pacientes. Também se difundiram amplamente as principais realizações do programa. Conclusões: Os candidatos aos Centros Comprometidos com a Excelência no Atendimento® têm feito um esforço e os resultados são positivos, com uma cultura crescente dos cuidados baseados em evidências, a promoção da investigação e do início do trabalho colaborativo em rede. [Albornos-Muñoz L, González-María E, Moreno-Casbas T. Implementação de manuais sobre boas práticas na Espanha. Programa dos Centros comprometidos com a excelência no atendimento. MedUNAB 2015; 17 (3): xx-xx].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.269
GPT teacher head0.625
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207