MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300429121 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-02/48/3591

Study about Overall Adhesion-Spreading Process of Liposomes on a Gold Electrode. Influence of the Presence of CdTe Quantum Dots

2016· article· en· W4300429121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eduardo Carlo Muñoz, Javier Román, Emilio Navarrete, Ricardo Silvio Schrebler

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum dotLiposomeMembraneMaterials scienceNanotechnologyContext (archaeology)NanoparticleAdhesionChemical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The utilization of quantum dots (QDs) it has been grown up into the material science area, because these nanoparticles have particular optical and electronic properties. These properties are dependent on the particle size, which can be controlled by the modification of some experimental conditions: temperature, reaction time, pH and molar ratio of precursors. QDs present a wide absorption spectrum, narrow emission fluorescence spectrum, high photo-stability, tunable band gap, high quantum yield, among others. These properties have allowed its application in different areas such as photovoltaic cells, biomedicine, chemical analysis, biosensors and biomarkers. However, particularly in the medicine field is very important to know what is the effect of QDs in contact with cell membranes. An approximation to this process could be the utilization of structures like lipid vesicles or liposomes, which also can be used as drug and biomarkers carriers. Some authors [1], [2] have used electrochemical methods in the study of liposomes, because the vesicles deposition process (adhesion and spreading processes) on metallic electrodes are similar to the lipid membranes fusion, providing information about e.g. exo- and endocytosis processes. In this context, this work is related with the influence of the interaction between CdTe QDs and 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) liposomes on the overall adhesion-spreading processes of liposomes modified by QDs. Synthesis of CdTe QDs was carried out in aqueous media, by using CdCl2 and Na2TeO3 as precursors, mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA) as capping agent and NaBH4 as reducing agent. Using a Doehlert’s experimental design was possible the optimization of the QDs sizes controlling the synthesis variables, i.e. temperature, reaction time, pH and molar ratio of precursors. After QDs were purified through ultracentrifugation with 1:1 water:isopropanol mixture and re-suspended in a buffer solution (borate buffer; pH 9.20). Finally, these were characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). On the other hand, DMPC liposomes were prepared by dissolving DMPC in chloroform, then evaporating solvent with Argon and suspending the lipids in borate buffer. Lipid suspension was cooled with liquid nitrogen and then heated below the phase transition temperature. Finally, lipids were extruded to obtain large unilamellar vesicles. After, the DMPC liposomes were deposited on gold electrode and characterized by CV observing the coverage degree by charge analysis. Additionally, the overall adhesion-spreading process of liposomes on gold electrode was characterized by means of chronoamperometry technique analyzing the corresponding current-time transients. Both analysis were performed after the mixing with CdTe QDs. The results show a decrease in the constant rate values of the adhesion-spreading processes of DMPC liposomes on gold electrode suggesting that the interaction CdTe(QD)-DMPC produces an increase in the activation energy of the lipid membranes fusion. References [1] V. A. Hernández and F. Scholz, “The Electrochemistry of Liposomes,” Isr. J. Chem., vol. 48, no. 3–4, pp. 169–184, 2008. [2] O. Pierrat, N. Lechat, C. Bourdillon, and J.-M. Laval, “Electrochemical and Surface Plasmon Resonance Characterization of the Step-by-Step Self-Assembly of a Biomimetic Structure onto an Electrode Surface,” Langmuir, vol. 13, no. 15, pp. 4112–4118, 1997.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207