MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300574218 · doi:10.1111/1468-0319.12189

World Economic Prospects

2015· article· en· W4300574218 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Outlook · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Business Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmerging marketsChinaEconomicsQuarter (Canadian coin)World economyMacroeconomicsGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Overview: Awaiting the first Fed rate hike Our world growth forecasts this month are unchanged at 2.5% for 2015 and 2.7% for 2016, but have dropped from 2.6% and 3% respectively in July. A key issue is how world growth will hold up as US rates start to rise. An initial Fed rate hike in December is in our baseline and has become increasingly likely over recent weeks given the US data flow. Arguably, global financial conditions have already started to tighten. US stocks have regained most of their August‐September losses but global stocks remain well below May's peak. Junk bond spreads have also widened since mid‐2015 and the latest credit standards surveys (see Research Briefing in this issue) had some worrying elements with a sharp worsening in emerging markets and less favourable readings in some advanced economies. Meanwhile, the slowdown in China and other emerging markets (EM) continues to weigh on global trade and industrial output. G7 industrial output is likely to have contracted for a second straight quarter in Q3 and manufacturing PMIs remain consistent with stagnant or declining output in most major EMs. The weakness in EM remains a major risk factor for the global economy as we move towards 2016, and could yet drag world growth down below this year's already‐moderate level. But so far, the difficult conditions in the industrial economy are not being mirrored in the services sector. In the advanced economies, services PMIs are mostly consistent with solid rates of expansion and have not shown a downward trend. This contrasts with the Eurozone crisis of 2011–12 when G7 services PMIs performed badly. The solid performance of service sectors has been accompanied by business confidence measures mostly holding up too, despite the serious wobble in stock markets in Q3. Overall, while our 2016 world growth forecasts are below consensus risks are skewed to the downside; in particular – despite developments to date – financial conditions could tighten more as Fed rate hikes begin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it