Advancing an Ecosystem Approach in the Gulf of Maine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<i>Abstract</i> .—The goal of this session was to provide a synthesis of the major pressures being exerted on the Gulf of Maine (GOM), including the Bay of Fundy, that constrain the achievement of ecosystem objectives or the desired state of valued attributes (ecological, social/cultural, and economic). The GOM boasts a diverse ecosystem, much changed ecologically over the past 400 years and long the subject of intense scrutiny by a host of universities, marine labs, and research centers in both the United States and Canada. While the presentations in the session noted that this ecosystem must cope with stressors that range from climate change to pharmaceuticals and nutrient loading to overfishing, the presentations also presented an historical perspective with lessons for resiliency, including successes of finer-scale and spatial management as well as collaborations in research and communication. It was recognized that a concerted effort to raise environmental literacy amongst the gulf ’s residents is essential to ensure that the full value of its ecosystems and resources is recognized and protected for future generations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".