MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300687315 · doi:10.1016/s2666-7568(22)00220-3

Clinical resource allocation for the mitigation of elder abuse – Authors' reply

2022· letter· en· W4300687315 on OpenAlexaff
Yusra Ribhi Shawar, Christopher Mikton, Marie Beaulieu, Yongjie Yon, Laura Campo-Tena

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Healthy Longevity · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicElder Abuse and Neglect
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersWorld Health Organization
KeywordsResource allocationElder abuseResource (disambiguation)PsychologyComputer scienceMedicineMedical emergencyComputer networkHuman factors and ergonomicsPoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We thank Dhruva Nandi and colleagues for their interest in our Article.1 They highlighted several considerations for improving policy attention to address elder abuse, which were valuable suggestions. However, we believe that they have misinterpreted some of our Article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Healthy LongevitySame topicElder Abuse and NeglectFrench-language works237,207