Assessing functional sympatholysis during rhythmic handgrip exercise using Doppler ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy: sex differences and test-retest reliability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of sympathetic activity on vasoconstriction are dampened in active skeletal muscle during exercise, a phenomenon termed functional sympatholysis. Limited work has examined the influence of sex on the magnitude of sympatholysis or the test-retest reliability of measurements. In 16 women and 15 men, forearm blood flow (FBF; Doppler ultrasound), muscle oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy, NIRS), and beat-to-beat mean arterial pressure (MAP; photoplethysmography) were measured during lower-body negative pressure (LBNP; −20 mmHg) at rest and simultaneously during rhythmic handgrip exercise (30% maximum contraction). Measures were taken twice within the same visit (separated by 15 min) and repeated on a second visit. Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/MAP. The magnitude of sympatholysis was calculated as the difference of LBNP-induced changes between handgrip and rest. LBNP decreased FBF (Δ−45 ± 15%), FVC (Δ−45 ± 16%), and muscle oxygenation (Δ−14 ± 11%); however, these responses were attenuated when LBNP was applied during rhythmic handgrip exercise (Δ−7 ± 9%, Δ−9 ± 10%, and Δ−6 ± 9%, respectively). The magnitude of sympatholysis was not different between men and women (FBF: 40 ± 16% vs. 35 ± 9%, P = 0.37; FVC: 38 ± 16% vs. 35 ± 11%, P = 0.53; muscle oxygenation: 5 ± 9% vs. 11 ± 10%, P = 0.11). Furthermore, sympatholysis measurements demonstrated good to excellent intraday (intraclass-correlation coefficients; ICC ≥ 0.85) and interday (ICC ≥ 0.72) test-retest reliability (all P ≤ 0.01) in both sexes. The coefficients of variation were larger with NIRS (68–91%) than with Doppler ultrasound (16%−22%) assessments of functional sympatholysis. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that assessments of functional sympatholysis are not impacted by biological sex and that Doppler ultrasound-derived measures of sympatholysis have better within-subject reliability than NIRS-derived measures in young healthy adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".