Surface Bending Resistance in Architected Nanoporous Metallic Materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Finite element method (FEM) is considered as a powerful tool for predicting the mechanical behavior of complex structures. However, the commercially available numerical packages based on FEM are mainly limited to the evaluation of multiphysical properties at the continuum scale and are unable to accurately evaluate the response of nanomaterials since the dominant surface effects in nanoscale analysis are overlooked. In this study, our introduced numerical methodology not only incorporates the effects of surface residual stress and surface tensile stiffness based on the Gurtin–Murdoch surface elasticity but also takes into account the bending stiffness of nanosurfaces in the numerical analysis. The computational results reveal that the stress concentration in nanoporous metallic materials is affected by the void geometry and is enhanced by the surface bending stiffness. In addition, the effect of void geometrical parameters on the elastic properties of nanoporous metallic metamaterials with negative Poisson's ratio is studied and the mechanism of surface tensile/bending stiffness is revealed in detail. The results show that the surface bending stiffness increases the effective Young's modulus of nanoarchitected metallic materials with negative Poisson's ratio and randomly distributed nanopores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it