MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300772807 · doi:10.1117/12.2633086

Integrated photonic-electronic platform for real-time analog data processing in LiDARs

2022· article· en· W4300772807 on OpenAlexaff
Mahsa Salmani, Sreenil Saha, Armaghan Eshaghi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLidarGraphics processing unitRangingData processingStream processingComputer hardwareReal-time computingEmbedded systemParallel computingRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Light, detection and ranging (LiDAR), has been emerging as a powerful tool for applications with accurate and reliable perception requirements, e.g., autonomous driving which needs a combination of long-range and high spatial resolution together with a real-time performance. Processing the raw LiDAR data, which is a large-dimensional unstructured 3D point cloud, is computationally costly due to the nature of the algorithms used for processing the point clouds. In particular, the neural networks employed for LiDAR data processing comprise several layers, for each of which multiplications of matrices with large sizes need to be performed. In this case, graphics processing units (GPUs) cannot be used as real-time standalone devices for hardware acceleration because they have high execution time due to their dependency on a central processing unit (CPU) for data offloading and scheduling the execution of the algorithms used to process point clouds. To address the aforementioned challenges, we propose an efficient co-design of an analog neural network (ANN) and a hybrid CMOS-Photonics platform for LiDAR systems. The proposed architecture exploits the high bandwidth and low latency of optical computation to significantly improve the computational efficiency. In particular, in our proposed architecture, a CMOS control chip integrated with a photonic broadcast-and-weight architecture is interfaced with LiDAR to perform real-time data processing and high-dimensional matrix multiplications. Moreover, by processing the raw LiDAR data in the analog domain, the proposed hybrid electro-optic computing platform minimizes the number of data converters in LiDAR systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207