MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300807390 · doi:10.18034/4ajournal.v4i1.23

Accounting for Intangible Assets: Use of Relevant Accounting Standards

2013· article· en· W4300807390 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Md. Aminul Islam

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Accounting and Auditing Advancement · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIntellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGoodwillAmortizationAccountingValuation (finance)Book valueTrademarkBusinessFinanceDebtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accounting practices of intangible assets like goodwill, patent, copyright, trademark, research, and development differ from country to country. In Australia, Belgium, Brazil Canada, France, Germany, Sweden, USA, Japan, and the Netherlands, systematic amortization is found. The period of amortization varies from 5 to 40 yrs. In Hong Kong, Mexico, Nigeria, Italy, the UK, and EC immediate write-off is more popular. In Switzerland no amortization is preferable. IAS and BAS provide that purchased goodwill may be amortized within 40 years but internally generated goodwill should not be amortized. Because there might be a subjective valuation of the market value of assets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.006
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Accounting and Auditing AdvancementSame topicIntellectual Capital and Performance AnalysisFrench-language works237,207