MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300879246 · doi:10.5957/icetech-2008-138

Examination of Shipping Regulations in the Canadian Arctic - Time for Revisions

2008· article· en· W4300879246 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ivana Kubat, G.W. Timco, Anne T. Collins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Cardiovascular Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticThe arcticOil pollutionEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental planningBusinessEnvironmental resource managementInternational shippingPollutionMeteorologyComputer scienceEnvironmental protectionOceanographyGeographyGeologyInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shipping in the Canadian Arctic is regulated by the Zone-Date System and outside its permissible dates by the Arctic Ice Regime Shipping System, which is used with certain conditions. This paper presents a methodology developed to examine the existing regulatory systems, describes results of the evaluation of the two existing systems, discusses their limitations, and outlines approaches, which were recommended as a more suitable means of pollution prevention in Canada’s Arctic waters. These approaches were presented and discussed at a meeting with the key stakeholders of the Arctic Shipping Pollution Prevention Regulations (ASPPR) including representatives of the ship owners and operators, and oil industry. It was concluded that an approach, which would make use of both Systems will be developed including the integration of the Polar Class vessels into the System.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.014
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207