MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300927986 · doi:10.1615/tsfp7.1590

LARGE AND VERY LARGE SCALE STRUCTURES IN THE OUTER REGION OF AN ADVERSE PRESSURE GRADIENT TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER

2011· article· en· W4300927986 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed Rahgozar, Yvan Maciel

Bibliographic record

VenueProceeding of Seventh International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse pressure gradientPressure gradientTurbulenceBoundary layerParticle image velocimetryMechanicsBoundary layer thicknessPhysicsVelocity gradientLength scaleFlow separationBoundary (topology)SuctionGeometryOpticsMeteorologyMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elongated regions of low and high momentum have been studied in the outer region of a turbulent boundary layer subjected to a strong adverse pressure gradient. Large sets of spanwise-streamwise instantaneous velocity fields are acquired by PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry) at three wall-normal positions (0.2δ, 0.5δ, 0.8δ) at three different streamwise locations in the adverse-pressure-gradient zone, from downstream of the strong suction peak up to detachment. Low- and high-speed regions are defined based on the fluctuating streamwise component of velocity. A pattern recognition method and a classification scheme are employed in order to obtain certain characteristics of the low- and high-speed u-structures. Like in the case of zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers, long meandering regions of low and high speed are observed in the outer region of the present flow. These structures are often longer than the 3δ streamwise length of our measurement planes and have dimensions that scale on boundary layer thickness. High- and low-speed u-structures are evenly spaced and their width is generally comparable to those previously reported for such structures in the overlap region of zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. The results also show that the adverse pressure gradient not only reduces the frequency of appearance of streaky structures but also shortens them in the lower part of the outer region (at 0.2δ) while in the upper part (at 0.5δ and 0.8δ) their dimensions and arrangement seem to be unaffected by the pressure gradient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceeding of Seventh International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow PhenomenaSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207