The Tettigoniidae (Orthoptera: Ensifera) from Ucumaríregional Natural Park (Rnp): Aspects of Acoustical Communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some aspects of acoustical communication of eight species of Tettigoniidae from Ucumarí Regional Natural Park (RNP) are presented for the first time. These species belong to three subfamilies: Pseudophyllinae (5 species): Trichottettix pilosula, Stetharasa exarmata, Chibchella nigrospecula, Scopioricus spatulatus, Typophyllum sp.; Copiphorinae (1 species): an unnamed genus and species, and Listroscelidinae (2 species): an unnamed genus and species. A brief diagnostic description and general ecological aspects of each species are provided. The physical structure of the five species found in Ucumarí is varied. The songs of the katydids described here are noisy, i.e. with many frequencies. The highest frequency encountered in this group was 17.5 kHz, produced by T. pilosula, and the lowest was 8 kHz, produced by Scopioricus spatulatus. Only one species presented energy in the ultrasonic range, and three species produced a band spectrum: Chibchella nigrospecula, Stetharasa exarmata and Scopioricus spatulatus; all of the others tend toward high-Q tones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".