Integrated asset management of urban water and wastewater systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a decision support system for the integrated management of water distribution and wastewater collection networks. The proposed methodology utilizes system dynamics to integrate water mains and sewers with finance and sociopolitical sectors. It enables user rate‐setting and planning of integrated water and wastewater infrastructure operational and capital works over their life‐cycle (50+ years). The integrated asset management model is implemented using data from a large‐sized utility in Southern Ontario, Canada. The result indicates that the integrated framework enables the utility to accelerate funding for capital and operational works due to the integration of the water and wastewater financial resources and improve the integrated levels of service. In practice, the proposed integrated framework empowers and encourages water utilities to manage and plan their assets in an integrated approach to enhance their water and wastewater assets' infrastructure, financial, and sociopolitical performance relative to managing them in isolation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it