Profile, recommendation criteria, and outcome of gastrostomy tube insertions in a pediatric teaching hospital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To describe the profile of patients undergoing a gastrostomy, the recommendations and outcome of this insertion in a Pediatric Teaching Hospital. Method: This was a retrospective, quantitative, and descriptive study that researched the records of patients who underwent a gastrostomy between January 2010 and December 2012. Results: The diseases and conditions most frequent were chronic infantile encephalopathy (77.5%), pneumonia (67.5%), seizures (57.5%), and malnutrition (42.5%). Although most patients presented a history of dysphagia (62.5%), oral feeding was observed most frequently as the most common form of nutrition, before the gastrostomy insertion (42.5%), followed by nasoenteric tube (40%). The introduction of nutrition by gastrostomy was successful and occurred an average of 2.82 (± 1.19) days after insertion. Six months after their gastrostomy, 80% of patients continued feeding only through this access tube and only 2.5% had removed the gastrostomy; 45% of the participants had gastrostomy complications, with extravasation of gastric material (15%) and local inflammation (15%) being the most frequent. Conclusion: The profile of patients undergoing gastrostomy is mostly of individuals with neurological and respiratory diseases, without respiratory support, of the male gender, and feeding by oral cavity or nasoenteric tube for a prolonged period. The main recommendation criteria were dysphagia and neurological diseases. Regarding the outcome, the introduction of nutrition by gastrostomy was successful; most individuals remained with this long-term nutritional support and the most common complications were gastric material extravasation and local inflammations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".