MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301183051 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.165404

Signatures of Lifshitz transition in the optical conductivity of two-dimensional tilted Dirac materials

2022· article· en· W4301183051 on OpenAlexafffund
Chaoyang Tan, Jian-Tong Hou, Chang-Xu Yan, Hong Guo, Hao-Ran Chang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOmegaPhysicsCondensed matter physicsType (biology)Phase transitionDirac (video compression format)AnisotropyPhase (matter)Fermi energyQuantum mechanicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lifshitz transition is a kind of topological phase transition in which the Fermi surface is reconstructed. It can occur in the two-dimensional (2D) tilted Dirac materials when the energy bands change between the type-I phase ($0 1$) through the type-III phase ($t=1$), where different tilts are parametrized by the values of $t$. In order to characterize the Lifshitz transition therein, we theoretically investigate the longitudinal optical conductivities (LOCs) in type-I, type-II, and type-III Dirac materials within linear response theory. In the undoped case, the LOCs are constants either independent of the tilt parameter in both type-I and type-III phases or determined by the tilt parameter in the type-II phase. In the doped case, the LOCs are anisotropic and possess two critical frequencies determined by $\ensuremath{\omega}={\ensuremath{\omega}}_{1}(t)$ and $\ensuremath{\omega}={\ensuremath{\omega}}_{2}(t)$, which are also confirmed by the joint density of state. The tilt parameter and chemical potential can be extracted from optical experiments by measuring the positions of these two critical boundaries and their separation $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}\ensuremath{\omega}(t)={\ensuremath{\omega}}_{2}(t)\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{1}(t)$. With increasing the tilting, the separation becomes larger in the type-I phase whereas smaller in the type-II phase. The LOCs in the regime of large photon energy are exactly the same as that in the undoped case. The type of 2D tilted Dirac bands can be determined by the asymptotic background values, critical boundaries, and their separation in the LOCs. These can therefore be taken as signatures of Lifshitz transition therein. The results of this work are expected to be qualitatively valid for a large number of 2D tilted Dirac materials, such as 8-Pmmn borophene monolayer, $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{SnS}}_{2}, {\mathrm{TaCoTe}}_{2}, {\mathrm{TaIrTe}}_{4}$, and $1{T}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ transition metal dichalcogenides, due to the underlying intrinsic similarities of 2D tilted Dirac bands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207