MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301228961 · doi:10.1353/phx.2018.0043

Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age by Donna Zuckerberg

2018· article· en· W4301228961 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aven McMaster

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDonkeyWhite (mutation)AnthropocentrismHistoryAnthropologySociologyMedia studiesArt historyClassicsEnvironmental ethicsArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 405 them. The sections on Australia and the United States also raise the issue of introduced species and the impact they have on native ecosystems, as well as the ethics surrounding their treatment as feral populations. The final chapter (“The Donkey’s Tale”) summarizes the main arguments that run throughout the book. Mitchell explains how we can use donkeys to study human history, as well as the potential risks of such study. One risk is anthropocentrism, which results in viewing the donkey as simply an agent that benefited humans. This does not allow researchers to fully study the human-donkey relationship, as it makes the donkey a human tool rather than a being capable of influencing actions through its own decisionmaking process. Finally, the author presents the reader with avenues for future research, indicating that this text is not meant to be the final word on donkeys in history, but rather the beginning of a dialogue on the topic. This book is a valuable addition to the fields of animal studies, zooarchaeology, history, and anthropology. Mitchell’s writing is clear and succinct, and the language used appealing to both specialists and newcomers to the topic. The text is lavishly illustrated with black-and-white images as well as colour plates. One puts this book down with a new perspective not just on the donkey in human history, but rather on how much of human history was possible because of the donkey. Mount Royal University Carolyn Willekes Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. By Donna Zuckerberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2018. Pp. 270. In this book, Donna Zuckerberg tackles head-on the relationship between some contemporary forms of misogyny and the classical world. It is a short, readable work combining scholarly approaches, analyses, and citational habits with an accessible narrative, tone, and style. It explains both the ancient and the social media world where necessary, while giving a nuanced and thoughtful account of the intersections between them that will be enlightening to classical scholars and savvy social media users alike. Zuckerberg clearly lays out the various groups connected to the most virulent expressions of online misogyny, where they have come from, what their views are, and how they use classical texts as justification, support, and inspiration for those views and their dissemination. Her aim is to uncover the mechanisms by which antiquity is used and mythologized to perpetuate patriarchal and white supremacist ideology; she hopes both to combat that ideology and to point towards a “vibrant, radical, intersectional feminist classics—one that uses the ancient world to enrich conversations about race, gender, and social justice” (188). The book is divided into four chapters, with a brief Introduction and Conclusion. It has extensive endnotes, a glossary, and a detailed bibliography. The first chapter, “Arms and the Manosphere,” outlines the online world of toxic masculinity, with terms and definitions and a sketch of what she often refers to as the “Red Pill community,” a collective term for a number of online groups whose membership is primarily or exclusively male and mostly white, and whose views centre around misogyny and opposition to feminism. Even those readers with some familiarity with the terms “Red Pill,” “MGTOW” (“Men Going Their Own Way”), “pickup artists,” and so forth will find this section clarifying, as the aims, ideologies, and memberships of these groups intersect in complicated ways, 406 PHOENIX while for many readers this chapter will serve as an essential introduction to an important subset of the online world. Zuckerberg delineates how the actual misogyny of the ancient world provides resources for modern misogyny, bolstered by the social and cultural capital of classics. This chapter demonstrates how easily some ancient texts, and the traditional approach to studying them, can be used to support extreme positions today. Zuckerberg also points out some similarities between the manosphere’s use of antiquity and attitude toward classics and feminism and the views and attitudes of some classical scholars—not only in the past, but also in the present. In the second chapter, “The Angriest Stoics,” the main topic is the appeal of Stoic philosophy and ancient Stoic writers for the Red...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicCulinary Culture and TourismFrench-language works237,207