MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4301408157 · doi:10.5957/icetech-2014-155

Analysis of Experimental Data and Quantifying Influence of Dimensionless Material Properties, Velocity and Aspect Ratio on Ice-induced Forces on Vertical Structures

2014· article· en· W4301408157 on OpenAlexaff
Aaruun V.M. Arunachalam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsCollege of the North Atlantic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimensionless quantityFroude numberThermodynamicsConstant (computer programming)PhysicsMaterials scienceChemistryMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the quantitative influence of aspect ratio (B/h), and dimensionless velocity or thickness Froude number [TFN = u/√(gh)] on dimensionless ice-induced pressures (pe/ρiu2) is briefly reviewed and discussed. Since material properties of ice (E, σf, K1c) have not been reported for many data-sets, a strategy for generating appropriate material properties for ice is proposed. Two dimensionless terms for material properties of ice, {(E/σf)×[K1c/(σf√h)]} and {[K1c/(σfu)]×√[E/(ρih)]} were identified and their influence on pe/ρiu2 is discussed. It was found that (1) pe/ρiu2 on rigid vertical structures decreases with (a) increasing B/h at a rate of about 0.42, when u/√(gh) and {[K1c/(σfu)]×√[E/(ρih)]} remain constant; (b) pe/ρiu2 decreases with increasing u/√(gh) at a rate of about 1.80 when u/√(gh) is < about 6.0×10-3and at a rate of about 1.93 when u/√(gh) is > about 6.0×10-3 when B/h and {[K1c/(σfu)]×√[E/(ρih)]} remain constant. (2) Preliminary analyses of the datasets shows that pe/ρiu2 decreases with increasing {(E/σf)× [K1c/(σf√h)]} at a rate of 0.335 and 0.469 and that pe/ρiu2 decreases with increasing {[K1c/(σfu)]×√[E/(ρih)]} at a rate of 0.729 and 0.808. (3) It was also found that shapes of structures do not influence dimensionless ice-induced pressures on structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→