MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4301628457 · doi:10.2196/39982

Deep Learning-Based Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection Using Emotion Features From Video Recordings (Preprint)

2022· article· en· W4301628457 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Essam Sleiman, Onur Cezmi Mutlu, Saimourya Surabhi, Arman Husic, Aaron Kline, Peter Washington, Dennis P. Wall

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Biomedical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintAutism spectrum disorderPsychologyEmotion recognitionAutismComputer scienceSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceCognitive psychologyAudiologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicineWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder encountered by 1 in 44 children in the United States of America. Autism patients face difficulty effectively communicating with peers, articulating feelings and emotions, and controlling behaviors. Rapid and early diagnosis leads to improved treatment outcomes, however current medical techniques often take years. Difficult, time-consuming diagnoses accompanied by the recent advances in computer vision have led to a surge of interest from researchers in developing models to streamline the autism diagnosis process. OBJECTIVE We aim to assess the viability of at-home autism diagnosis by leveraging video data collected from a mobile game app to train a computer vision model utilizing insights extracted from the change in emotion expression features over time. METHODS With our GuessWhat game-based mobile app, we collect a video dataset of 74 ASD and NT children actively playing in a natural home environment. To investigate and quantify the significance of facial emotion features for ASD detection, we develop a deep learning-based autism classifier with two components: a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) attached to a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM). We pre-train our CNN backbone in two fashions: (1) on ImageNet or (2) on a compilation of Facial Expression Recognition (FER) datasets to analyze autism detection performance improvements utilizing emotion features. The output of each CNN is fed into an LSTM model to diagnose ASD from video data. RESULTS Our top-performing architecture utilizing a CNN backbone pre-trained on ImageNet obtained an accuracy of 45.8% and an F1 score of 62.8% while our corresponding top architecture employing a CNN backbone trained on the FER datasets achieved top accuracy of 91.2% and an F1 score of 90.6%. CONCLUSIONS We discovered the change in an individual's facial expression features over time as a relevant marker for autism detection. Extracting emotional features from each frame resulted in a 27.8% F1 score improvement when compared to non-emotion weights. Our study demonstrates the capability of mobile applications to collect a natural, diverse dataset for an improved autism diagnosis. These results demonstrate Deep Learning and Computer Vision based methods are instrumental for automated autism diagnosis from at-home recorded videos using unspecialized equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Biomedical Engineering→Same topicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research→French-language works237,207→