Deep Learning-Based Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection Using Emotion Features From Video Recordings (Preprint)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder encountered by 1 in 44 children in the United States of America. Autism patients face difficulty effectively communicating with peers, articulating feelings and emotions, and controlling behaviors. Rapid and early diagnosis leads to improved treatment outcomes, however current medical techniques often take years. Difficult, time-consuming diagnoses accompanied by the recent advances in computer vision have led to a surge of interest from researchers in developing models to streamline the autism diagnosis process. OBJECTIVE We aim to assess the viability of at-home autism diagnosis by leveraging video data collected from a mobile game app to train a computer vision model utilizing insights extracted from the change in emotion expression features over time. METHODS With our GuessWhat game-based mobile app, we collect a video dataset of 74 ASD and NT children actively playing in a natural home environment. To investigate and quantify the significance of facial emotion features for ASD detection, we develop a deep learning-based autism classifier with two components: a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) attached to a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM). We pre-train our CNN backbone in two fashions: (1) on ImageNet or (2) on a compilation of Facial Expression Recognition (FER) datasets to analyze autism detection performance improvements utilizing emotion features. The output of each CNN is fed into an LSTM model to diagnose ASD from video data. RESULTS Our top-performing architecture utilizing a CNN backbone pre-trained on ImageNet obtained an accuracy of 45.8% and an F1 score of 62.8% while our corresponding top architecture employing a CNN backbone trained on the FER datasets achieved top accuracy of 91.2% and an F1 score of 90.6%. CONCLUSIONS We discovered the change in an individual's facial expression features over time as a relevant marker for autism detection. Extracting emotional features from each frame resulted in a 27.8% F1 score improvement when compared to non-emotion weights. Our study demonstrates the capability of mobile applications to collect a natural, diverse dataset for an improved autism diagnosis. These results demonstrate Deep Learning and Computer Vision based methods are instrumental for automated autism diagnosis from at-home recorded videos using unspecialized equipment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".