Redes sociales e inserción social: el interés de un enfoque relacional para la investigación en trabajo social
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo trata sobre cómo la integración de las personas y de los grupos sociales a la sociedad, especialmente de poblaciones vulnerables, ha sido siempre objeto central del servicio social en Quebec. Desde mediados de los años setenta, la inserción, junto a su misión de adaptación y control social, ha captado mucho más la atención del trabajo social luego de importantes cambios sociales (Goyette, 2004). Así, poblaciones que no acostumbraban a recurrir a programas de servicio social ni al Estado, mujeres y personas en general, pero sobre todo los jóvenes- van desde entonces a ocupar el centro de interés del servicio social y de las políticas públicas. Frente a esto, el servicio social llevará su preocupación al tema de la inserción de la juventud, en la medida en que el aumento de figuras de exclusión refuerza la necesidad de favorecer los valores de solidaridad, justicia social, respeto y autonomía, bandera de esta disciplina tanto en su ética como en su práctica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.058 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.017 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".