MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301727254 · doi:10.4000/cchyp.309

Cypriote antiquities in late Ottoman Istanbul and Smyrna - I

2017· article· fr· W4301727254 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Robert Stuart Merrillees

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers du Centre d Etudes Chypriotes · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBrock UniversityBritish Institute at AnkaraGovernment of the United KingdomAmerican Research Institute in Turkey
KeywordsHumanitiesArtOttoman empireStatueArt historyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le musée archéologique d’Istanbul en Turquie détient une collection importante d’antiquités chypriotes qui proviennent pour la plupart d’un don involontaire en 1874 de Luigi Palma di Cesnola, consul américain à Larnaca (Chypre). À cette époque-là l’île faisait partie de l’Empire ottoman, et même si les responsables turcs ne s’intéressaient pas au passé chypriote, certains voulaient faire respecter les lois en vigueur portant sur les antiquités. Ainsi, le musée impérial de Constantinople a acquis également en 1874 une statue de Bès amathousien, la plus grande jamais mise au jour à Chypre. Cependant, pour des raisons liées au snobisme occidental et à l’indifférence orientale, la collection chypriote tout entière reste peu connue et peu étudiée depuis son arrivée à Constantinople et, même de nos jours, elle attend un catalogue raisonné définitif. Cette étude circonstanciée, se basant sur des sources publiquement accessibles, retrace la trajectoire peu chanceuse de ces vestiges intrigants de l’antiquité chypriote à Istanbul, dont beaucoup sont exposés actuellement dans une galerie du musée consacrée aux civilisations limitrophes de la Turquie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers du Centre d Etudes ChypriotesSame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207