MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301750342 · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2015p0520

Influence of the Plasma Radiation Scattered by Inflight Particles on Temperature Measurement in Suspension Plasma Spraying

2015· article· en· W4301750342 on OpenAlexaff
Bishoy Aziz, Christian Moreau

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal spray · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyrometerMaterials sciencePlasmaThermal sprayingSuspension (topology)RadiationTemperature measurementGas dynamic cold sprayCoatingAtmospheric-pressure plasmaDeposition (geology)OpticsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The temperature of in-flight particles in plasma spraying is one of the main parameters affecting the coating microstructure. Temperature measurement has been carried out before for inflight particles in air plasma spray (APS) and other thermal spraying processes. Suspension plasma spray (SPS) is an emerging coating deposition technology that permits the deposition of nanostructured coatings with unique structural characteristics. The aim of this work is to evaluate the influence of radiation emitted by the plasma and metallic vapors on temperature measurement of SPS particles performed by two-color pyrometry. To do so, spectroscopic analysis in the visible to near-infrared range is carried out on the jet stream when suspension of 20wt% YSZ particles in ethanol is sprayed. The analysis takes into account the radiation scattered by the particles (Mie scattering) as well as the radiation directly detected from the jet stream, and it was found that the effect of the scattered radiation by the particles on temperature measurement is 1 degree at its melting point (2700°C) and 16 degrees at 2500°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal spraySame topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207