MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301760954 · doi:10.4000/books.pupo.21320

Autonomie de l’œuvre double

2017· book-chapter· fr· W4301760954 on OpenAlexaff
Cosmin Toma

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Paris Nanterre eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsCouncil of Ontario Universities
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inscrite en marge de l’œuvre, c’est pourtant l’une des affirmations les plus emblématiques de Maurice Blanchot, d’autant plus qu’elle se décline à la troisième personne du singulier : je veux dire la célèbre notice biographique qui apparaît en exergue de bon nombre de ses livres. Inutile de la citer à nouveau, chacun sait qu’elle installe l’auteur de Thomas l’Obscur au cœur même de la littérature, voire de l’absolu littéraire, témoignant d’un dévouement qui se vérifie aisément d’une œuvre à l...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Paris Nanterre eBooksSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207