MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301937162 · doi:10.11361/reportscpij.12.3_114

An idea of the new town management system of the gated community

2013· article· en· W4301937162 on OpenAlexaff
Takahito Takei

Bibliographic record

VenueToshi keikaku hokokushu/Toshi keikaku houkokushuu · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban and spatial planning
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental planningGeographyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本論は〈新タウン・マネジメント構想〉として政治学的視点より、〈まち〉にデモクラシーを実現させることを要諦とする。それは地方分権、デモクラシーの本質から政治的共同性を人びとの手に取り戻す意味での、〈まち〉におけるガバナンスの確立、機能増進を提起したもので、それゆえの〈新タウン・マネジメント構想〉である。本構想については、ケーススタディとして具体に私の地元であり、そのもっとも相応しい場所たると考える京都の中心市街地に適用することで、それが副次的にエコロジー、インフラ維持、観光、密集市街地整備の増進に資することを検証しつつ、行政の進めている「歩く〈まち〉・京都」に貢献する斬新な方法である可能性について言及したい。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToshi keikaku hokokushu/Toshi keikaku houkokushuuSame topicUrban and spatial planningFrench-language works237,207