MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Frequency-Domain Uncertainty Quantification Using Parameterized Model Order Reduction

2022· article· en· W4302014076 on OpenAlexaff
Francesco Ferranti, Daniele Romano, Luigi Lombardi, Giulio Antonini, Ye Tao, M. Nakhla

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility – EMC Europe · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParameterized complexityReduction (mathematics)Model order reductionUncertainty quantificationFrequency domainComputer scienceAlgorithmProcess (computing)Domain (mathematical analysis)Measurement uncertaintyMathematical optimizationMathematicsStatisticsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A parameterized model order reduction technique is investigated for the efficient frequency-domain uncertainty quantification of circuits obtained by the Partial Element Equiv-alent Circuit method. The parameterized model order reduction technique is coupled with a standard M C analysis and it is able to provide accurate uncertainty quantification results at a significantly reduced computational cost. Choosing the order of the parameterized model order reduction model is an important step depending on the detail of statistical information needed from the uncertainty quantification process. A practical approach is used for order selection. Numerical results for correlated random variables have validated the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed uncertainty quantification method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility – EMC EuropeSame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207