MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Frequency-Domain Uncertainty Quantification Using Parameterized Model Order Reduction

2022· article· en· W4302014076 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility – EMC Europe · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParameterized complexityReduction (mathematics)Model order reductionUncertainty quantificationFrequency domainComputer scienceAlgorithmProcess (computing)Domain (mathematical analysis)Measurement uncertaintyMathematical optimizationMathematicsStatisticsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A parameterized model order reduction technique is investigated for the efficient frequency-domain uncertainty quantification of circuits obtained by the Partial Element Equiv-alent Circuit method. The parameterized model order reduction technique is coupled with a standard M C analysis and it is able to provide accurate uncertainty quantification results at a significantly reduced computational cost. Choosing the order of the parameterized model order reduction model is an important step depending on the detail of statistical information needed from the uncertainty quantification process. A practical approach is used for order selection. Numerical results for correlated random variables have validated the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed uncertainty quantification method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it