TACCO: Unified annotation transfer and decomposition of cell identities for single-cell and spatial omics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rapid advances in single-cell-, spatial-, and multi-omics, allow us to profile cellular ecosystems in tissues at unprecedented resolution, scale, and depth. However, both technical limitations, such as low spatial resolution and biological variations, such as continuous spectra of cell states, often render these data imperfect representations of cellular systems, best captured as continuous mixtures over cells or molecules. Based on this conceptual insight, we build a versatile framework, TACCO (Transfer of Annotations to Cells and their COmbinations) that extends an Optimal Transport-based core by different wrappers or boosters to annotate a wide variety of data. We apply TACCO to identify cell types and states, decipher spatio-molecular tissue structure at the cell and molecular level, and resolve differentiation trajectories. TACCO excels in speed, scalability, and adaptability, while successfully outperforming benchmarks across diverse synthetic and biological datasets. Along with highly optimized visualization and analysis functions, TACCO forms a comprehensive integrated framework for studies of high-dimensional, high-resolution biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".