MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4302028961 · doi:10.37391/ijeer.100325

IoT Based Pulse Oximeter for Remote Health Assessment: Design, Challenges and Futuristic Scope

2022· article· en· W4302028961 on OpenAlexaff
K. Revathi, T. Tamilselvi, G. Gomathi, R. Divya

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer scienceAnalyticsScope (computer science)Pulse (music)Wearable computerComputer securityTelecommunicationsEmbedded systemData science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet of Things (IoT) comprises the networking, computing, and storage with analytics technologies that do wonders in every aspect of human life through its applications and turns their life style as smart as possible. The application of IoT in healthcare domain would transform the medical service to be timely accessible and affordable by all people. The cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are marked as one of the most common cause of death around the world. A research study states that CVD targets the public with age limit of 30 - 60 belongs to developing countries like India in an evidential growth. The continuous monitoring of human heart, which is a fist sized strongest muscle through invasive sensors helps in early detection and anticipating necessary treatment on time. This induces a design of IoT enabled pulse rate monitoring system to continuously track the patient at anywhere and better serve them at any time through any device. The device uses easy pulse sensor and is operated through Raspberry Pi. The effectiveness of the device is analyzed against one of the top brand fingertip pulse oximeter, suggested for home and clinical usage in practice. Further the non-invasive design of pulse oximeter which determines the blood pressure (BP) using electrocardiography (ECG) and photo plethysmography (PPG) sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Electrical and Electronics ResearchSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207