MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4302091138

Implementación de guías de buenas prácticas clínicas elaboradas por Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) en el curriculum de Enfermería Universidad de Chile / Implementation of Clinical Best Practice Guidelines Done by The Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO) in the Nursing Curriculum at Universidad de Chile / Implementação de manuais de boas práticas clínicas desenvolvidas por Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) no currículo de Enfermagem da Universidade do Chile

2015· article· es· W4302091138 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lic. en Enf. y Obstetricia Amalia Silva-G

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumMedicineLibrary scienceHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducción: La investigación desarrollada en enfermería en el último tiempo ha permitido generar conocimientos que aportan a mejorar el cuidado de salud que otorgan los profesionales, se han confeccionado protocolos y guías clínicas con la finalidad de ofrecer a los profesionales de la salud la mejor evidencia para la práctica clínica, viéndose beneficiadas con ello, principalmente, las personas que requieren cuidados y también las instituciones al disminuir sus costos. Para llegar a esta meta es indispensable la capacitación continua de los profesionales de la salud y la inclusión de la formación de estos contenidos en los programas de las instituciones formadoras. Objetivo: Este artículo presenta la experiencia de implementación de cuatro guías de buena práctica clínica elaboradas por Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO) en dos planes de formación que se encontraba desarrollando en el Departamento / Escuela de Enfermería de la Universidad de Chile para los profesionales de enfermería. Metodología: Para la metodología de implementación se consideró como marco de referencia el material elaborado para este fin por parte de la organización RNAO denominado “Recursos para el Docente”, se apoya en modelos de desarrollo y progresión del aprendizaje como el modelo de Patricia Benner para la elaboración de la hipótesis de progresión de los contenidos en el curriculum de Enfermería, como también la pirámide de Miller para la evaluación de las competencias. Conclusiones: se espera que los estudiantes una vez terminada su formación cuenten con las herramientas implementadas bajo esta metodología, las cuales les permitan un desempeño profesional fundamentado en cuidados de enfermería basados en la evidencia científica. [Silva-G A. Implementación de guías de buenas prácticas clínicas elaboradas por Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) en el curriculum de Enfermería Universidad de Chile. MedUNAB 2015; 17(3): xx-xx]. Introduction: The research developed in the recent time in nursing, has generated knowledge that improve health care provided by professionals, has generated clinical guidelines and protocols in order to provide health professionals with the best evidence for clinical practice, seeing that it benefits mainly the patients requiring care, and the care-providing institutions by reducing their costs. To reach this goal it is essential in the ongoing training of health professionals and training institutions to include in their training programs such content. Objective: This article presents the experience of implementing four guides of good clinical practices elaborated by Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO) in both training plans which in that moment the School of Nursing of Universidad de Chile was developing for the future professionals. Methodology: The methodology of implementation considered as reference the material elaborated by RNAO denominated “Resources for the Teaching”, which relies on models of development and progression of learning as the Patricia Benner model for the elaboration of the hypothesis of progression of the contents in the Nursing curriculum, as well as the Miller pyramid for the evaluation of the competences. Conclusions: It is expected that the students, once they finish their training, can count on these tools that allow them a professional performance giving nursing care based on the scientific evidence. [Silva-G A. Implementation of Clinical Best Practice Guidelines Done by The Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO) in the Nursing Curriculum at Universidad de Chile. MedUNAB 2015; 17(3): xx-xx]. Introdução: A pesquisa desenvolvida na enfermagem nos últimos tempos tem gerado conhecimentos que permitem melhorar os cuidados e a atenção que os profissionais da saúde prestam aos usuários; foram feitos protocolos e manuais clínicos a fim de prover aos profissionais de saúde melhores evidências para a prática clínica, sendo os mais beneficiados aqueles que necessitam dos cuidados e as instituições ao ver reduzidos os seus custos. Para alcançar este objetivo, é essencial a formação permanente de profissionais de saúde e, além disto, as instituições de formação devem incluir nos seus programas de treinamento tais conteúdos. Objetivo: Este artigo apresenta a experiência de implementação de quatro manuais de boas práticas clínicas desenvolvidas pela Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) em dois programas de formação desenvolvidos no Departamento / Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade do Chile para profissionais de enfermagem. Metodologia: Para a metodologia de implementação foi considerado como um quadro de referência os materiais desenvolvidos para este fim pela organização RNAO chamado "Recursos para Professores" fundamentado nos modelos de desenvolvimento e progressão da aprendizagem como é o modelo Patricia Benner para o desenvolvimento da hipótese de progressão de conteúdos no currículo de Enfermagem e a pirâmide Miller para avaliação de competências. Conclusão: Espera-se que os alunos, ao finalizarem sua formação, adquiram as ferramentas implementadas no âmbito desta metodologia que lhes permitam um desempenho profissional fundamentado nos cuidados de enfermagem baseada na evidência científica. [Silva-G A. Implementação de manuais de boas práticas clínicas desenvolvidas por Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) no currículo de Enfermagem da Universidade do Chile. MedUNAB 2015; 17(3): xx-xx].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.577
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationFrench-language works237,207