Bibliographic record
Abstract
The homicides and the suicide On Tuesday 28 April 2015, 19-year-old Emily Janzen was fatally shot twice in the head by her father, 50-year-old Randy, in the Rosedale family home located in the Canadian province of British Columbia. Later that same day, Randy killed his wife, 56-year-old Laurel, also shooting her twice in the head. One week after these killings, on Tuesday 5 May, he travelled to the Langley home of his sister Shelly – a 40-minute, 60-km drive on the Trans-Canada Highway from Rosedale. Shelly, who was 53, had just returned home from a shopping trip and her bags were still over her shoulders. Similar to the manner in which he had killed Emily and Laurel, Randy shot Shelly twice in the head. He covered her body with several layers of blankets before leaving the house. Two days later, on Thursday 7 May at around 12 noon, Randy's Facebook friends noticed a status update on his profile. It read: Over the last 10 days, I have done some of the worst things I could have ever imagined doing. First to do with my dear sweet loving daughter Emily. The best little girl two parents could ever hope for. She was talented and smart and filled out hearts with her laughter. She was always willing to help with a smile even when she was feeling lousy. Emily excelled at so many things but slowly had to stop almost everything because of the migraines. (But when it effected her beloved singing it took a part of her soul). She has been very ill with migraines that have plagued her since Elementary School. This has caused her to miss two years at UBC, which completely broke her heart. I don't think anyone really knew how much pain Emily was in on a daily basis and the severe depression that these migraines caused her. Emily watched her friends from high school move on with their lives, while hers was spent wretching into a puke tray and hours at the Emergency rm. Since Oct/Nov her migraines have escalated to excruciating again and I just could not see my little girl hurt for one more second.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".