MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4302293118 · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33562-9

Using domain knowledge for robust and generalizable deep learning-based CT-free PET attenuation and scatter correction

2022· article· en· W4302293118 on OpenAlexaff
Rui Guo, Song Xue, Jiaxi Hu, Hasan Sari, Clemens Mingels, Konstantinos Zeimpekis, George Prenosil, Yue Wang, Yu Zhang, Marco Viscione, Raphael Sznitman, Axel Rominger, Biao Li, Kuangyu Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCorrection for attenuationComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)AttenuationArtificial intelligenceDeep learningScannerComputer visionBottleneckTranslation (biology)Pet imagingPET-CTFrequency domainPositron emission tomographyNuclear medicineOpticsPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the potential of deep learning (DL)-based methods in substituting CT-based PET attenuation and scatter correction for CT-free PET imaging, a critical bottleneck is their limited capability in handling large heterogeneity of tracers and scanners of PET imaging. This study employs a simple way to integrate domain knowledge in DL for CT-free PET imaging. In contrast to conventional direct DL methods, we simplify the complex problem by a domain decomposition so that the learning of anatomy-dependent attenuation correction can be achieved robustly in a low-frequency domain while the original anatomy-independent high-frequency texture can be preserved during the processing. Even with the training from one tracer on one scanner, the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed approach are confirmed in tests of various external imaging tracers on different scanners. The robust, generalizable, and transparent DL development may enhance the potential of clinical translation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207