The Effect of Perceived Occupational Performance on Community Participation and Quality of Life of Gynecologic Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The aim was to determine the effect of perceived occupational performance and satisfaction on community participation and quality of life of gynaecologic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Material and Methods: Thirty gynaecologic cancer patients randomly were assigned for evaluation. Socio-demographic assessments were made, moreover, occupational performance and satisfaction were assessed with Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM), community participation was determined by World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS 2) and quality of life was determined by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General test (FACT-G). Frequencies were calculated with descriptive analysis. The relationship between the variables was evaluated with “Pearson’s correlation analysis”. Results: Of the 30 (mean age 54.96±10.52 years) patients, 76.7% had ovarian, 3.3% had cervix and 20% had endometrial cancer. According to COPM, 19% declared that the hardest activity was to visit neighbours. A positive correlation was found between occupational performance and community participation (r= .442, p<0.05) as well as quality of life (r=.403, p<0.05 ). Occupational satisfaction scores were found to be positively correlated with quality of life scores (r= .458, p<0.05). conclusion: Our results demonstrated that as occupational performance and satisfaction levels decreased, quality of life and community participation decreased. Therefore, during the occupational rehabilitation of the patient with cancer, evaluating the personal and environmental factors for self-care, productivity, leisure activities; planning and implementing interventions are important for increasing the quality of life and community participation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".