MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Law of criminal offences and its real effectiveness in Monte Castelo during the period 2008-2012

2014· article· en· W4302572490 on OpenAlex
Sandro Luíz Bazzanella, Danielly Borguezan, ANA JULIA BERTOLIN

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Jurídica de Investigación e Innovación Educativa (REJIE Nueva Época) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMisdemeanorDictatorshipConstitutionLawCriminal lawPolitical scienceDecreeState (computer science)Period (music)PoliticsCriminologySociologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the dictatorship period, after Brazil suffered a coup, carried on by Getulio Vargas in 1930, which led to a new political system, known as "New State", it became necessary to create rules that would establish order and state security. Thus the Law of Misdemeanor Criminal published by Decree-Lawn. 3688, on 3 October 1941. However, after seventy years of its term that law is regarded by some scholars as the very old, why was enacted before the Constitution Federal/88, and wonders why their receptivity. In turn, the same is applicable to the present day, but with some changes due to the evolution of society. This is where we intend to develop the work, analyzing the (in) effectiveness of this law demonstrating its reality regarding compliance with the standard in Monte Castelo, Santa Catarina State, during the period 2008-2012.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it