Religion, political participation and civic engagement: women’s experiences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The role that religion plays in shaping political and civic behaviour has received significant attention in recent years (see, for example, Norris and Inglehart, 2005). Religion's influence on political behaviour has been well established (Layman, 1997). Burns et al (2001, p 231) suggest that ‘religious institutions are a crucial component of civic society’. Within this area of research, however, women have received less focused attention. This stems perhaps from religion's longstanding negative impact on women's equality, and the traditional roles that it can assign to them in both the public and the private sectors (Woodhead, 2001; Inglehart and Norris, 2003). Extant research has revealed the specific ways in which women are sometimes able to benefit and find individual agency within the most patriarchal of religious institutions (see, for example, Ammerman, 1987). Within many such institutions, women can receive the stimulus and claim the agency necessary for participating in political and civil arenas (Caiazza, 2005; O’Neill, 2006). A comprehensive understanding of the connections between religion, political participation and civic engagement requires an examination of women's experiences in faith communities (Burns et al, 2001; Inglehart and Norris, 2003). This chapter moves in that direction by examining the connection between religion and spirituality and women's political and civic engagement. The distinction between religion and spirituality is an important one. Much of the research examining political behaviour focuses on religion , that is, the set of beliefs and practices related to an organised and communal belief system, rather than faith or spirituality , which involves the more personal and subjective elements of such organised systems. The former has been shown to affect women's political attitudes and behaviour in multiple ways. Women's private roles as wives and mothers and, more publicly, as protectors of society's morality, reflect the prescriptions found within various religions. First-wave ‘maternal’ feminism in Canada was intimately connected to women's participation in religious organisations, helping to explain not only their acceptance of private and public roles but also the focus on good works, charity and social reform designed to raise the moral standard of early 20th-century Canada (Newman and White, 2006). Women's memberships of religious organisations continue to account for a large portion of their volunteering activities (O’Neill, 2006).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".