MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4302587199 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.10746

Sufficient conditions for the value function and optimal strategy to be\n even and quasi-convex

2017· preprint· en· W4302587199 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBellman equationMarkov decision processMonotone polygonMathematical optimizationFunction (biology)Value (mathematics)Convex functionRegular polygonMathematicsConvex optimizationState spaceMarkov processComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sufficient conditions are identified under which the value function and the\noptimal strategy of a Markov decision process (MDP) are even and quasi-convex\nin the state. The key idea behind these conditions is the following. First,\nsufficient conditions for the value function and optimal strategy to be even\nare identified. Next, it is shown that if the value function and optimal\nstrategy are even, then one can construct a "folded MDP" defined only on the\nnon-negative values of the state space. Then, the standard sufficient\nconditions for the value function and optimal strategy to be monotone are\n"unfolded" to identify sufficient conditions for the value function and the\noptimal strategy to be quasi-convex. The results are illustrated by using an\nexample of power allocation in remote estimation.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it