The Adjustment of Legal Instruments to the New European Architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The agreements of the first generation combined with the PHARE extended to all CEE countries have the ambition to support and accelerate the democratization and restructuring Eastern Europe countries. It is now important to consolidate this extra support and a recomposition of space around the pole of European Community and beyond its immediate influence sphere, across the continent, including the USSR, with, possibly, the involvement of U.S. and Canada. The location plan showing new lines of forces, new reports,and news breaks, the Community needs to refine his own architectural design, plan and prepare new Extensions, on the basis of association agreements with a new type: the "Europe Agreements" with, inprinciple, all countries of Central Europe, without condemning the isolation of the other countries, especially the ex-USSR. The association of the non-great power in fact, not being regarded as a non-relationship. The ex-USSR must enjoy a special relationship when it moves itself even on the path of democratization and restructuring building on existing structures, such as the Council of Europe and the CSCE. The pan-European cooperation is then superimposed European association.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".