Conjugal separation and immigration in the life course of immigrant single mothers in Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single parenthood over the past few decades has been a focus of family scholar research that has shown its characteristics as a family form, its risks and opportunities, as well as its coping mechanisms. Within this body of research, the situation of immigrant single parents is less documented, although specific conditions particularise this experience, as it will be demonstrated in this chapter. We intend to discuss whether or not immigration can initiate a turning point in the lives of parents experiencing a conjugal separation after settling in the receiving society. Examples are drawn from a research based on biographic interviews with immigrant single mothers of different ethnic origins established in Québec City. First, we briefly present the current situation in this field. Second, the theoretical approach is introduced, discussing the definition of turning points as well as the main life course principles that underlie our research. Third, several details about our study's context and methodology are presented. Finally, we analyse those family trajectories and dynamics where a conjugal separation occurs, and then conclude with a discussion about the significance of single parenthood and the impact of immigration and conjugal separation on individuals’ lives. Experiencing a conjugal separation in an immigration context Since the 1970s, in all Western societies, the number and proportion of single parents among households with children has constantly increased. In the province of Québec, in 2006 single parents represented 29 per cent of all families and 23.0 per cent of children lived in a single-parent household (MFA, 2011). This phenomenon also presents two other important characteristics: its feminisation (80 per cent of single parents are women) and relative rejuvenation – single parents are younger than other categories of parents (Cloutier et al, 2004). Entry into single parenthood can entail positive consequences, such as the improvement of family climate and stability where the parent or child has experienced domestic conflict or abuse (Amato, 2000; Parent et al, in press). However, as many studies point out, single parenthood also brings about many risks and difficulties of a social, economic and psychological nature (Dandurand and Ouellette, 1992; Lefaucheur, 1993; Lefaucheur and Martin, 1993; Le Gall and Martin, 1996; Duncan and Edwards, 1997; Martin, 1997; Cloutier et al, 2004).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".