EPR volume 14 issue 4 Cover and Front matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From immigration over redistributive attitudes to welfare spending. The moderating role of social program design Leonce rth, Dennis Spies and alexander Schmidt-Catran Labour market policies and support for populist radical right parties: the role of nostalgic producerism, occupational risk, and feedback effects Matthew E. Bergman How challenger party issue entrepreneurship and mainstream party strategies drive public issue salience: evidence from radical-right parties and the issue of immigration Christopher J. williams and Sophia Hunger Space invaders and norm-politicians: how the media represent the intersectional identities of Members of Parliament Zahra runderkamp, Daphne van der pas, anne Louise Schotel and Liza Mgge When does women's political power matter? Women's representation and legal gender equality of economic opportunity across contexts Nam Kyu Kim The good, the loyal or the active? MPs' parliamentary performance and the achievement of static and progressive career ambitions in parliament richard Schobess and Benjamin de vet Who's fit for the job? Allocating ministerial portfolios to outsiders and experts Matthias Kaltenegger and Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik Citizens' preferences for liberal democracy and its deformations: Evidence from Germany -Erratum
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.652 | 0.303 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".