MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4303423493 · doi:10.1007/s12274-022-4906-1

Efficient quantum dot infrared solar cells with enhanced low-energy photon conversion via optical engineering

2022· article· en· W4303423493 on OpenAlexaff
Sisi Liu, Mingyu Li, Kao Xiong, Jianbo Gao, Xinzheng Lan, Daoli Zhang, Liang Gao, Jianbing Zhang, Jiang Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptoelectronicsQuantum dotMaterials scienceAbsorption (acoustics)Energy conversion efficiencyQuantum dot solar cellInfraredLead sulfidePlasmonic solar cellPhotoactive layerSolar cellHybrid solar cellQuantum efficiencyOpticsPolymer solar cellPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrared (IR) solar cells are promising devices for improving the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of conventional solar cells by expanding the utilization region of the sunlight spectrum to near-infrared range. IR solar cells based on colloidal quantum dots (QDs) have attracted extensive attention due to the widely tunable absorption spectrum controlled by dot size and the unique solution processibility. However, the trade-off in QD solar cells between light absorption and photo-generated carrier collection has limited the further improvement of PCE. Here, we present high-performance PbS QD IR solar cells resulting from the combination of boosted light absorption and optimized carrier extraction. By constructing an optical resonance cavity, the light absorption is significantly enhanced in the range of 1,150–1,300 nm at a relatively thin photoactive layer. Meanwhile, the thin photoactive layer facilitates efficient carrier extraction. Consequently, the PbS QD IR solar cells exhibit a highly efficient photoelectric conversion in the IR region, resulting in a high IR PCE of 1.3% which is comparable to the highest value of solution-processed IR solar cells based on PbSe QDs. These results demonstrate that constructing an optical resonance cavity is a reasonable strategy for effective conversion of photons in the devices aiming at light in a relatively narrow wavelength range, such as IR solar cells and narrow band photodetectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano ResearchSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207